John Wallis on Art
Browse 3 quotations attributed to John Wallis, catalogued under art, with dates where available.
This page displays 3 quotations attributed to John Wallis and filed under "art" in QuoteLineage. The selection is ordered by stored importance and quality scores, not citation counts. A topic label describes how an entry is catalogued; it does not establish the theme's importance in the author's work.
Attributed to John Wallis, entry #15649: "John Davys, John Wallis, An Essay on the Art of Decyphering: In which is inserted a discourse of Dr. Wallis. Now first publish'd from his original manuscript in the publick librar…"
Attributed to John Wallis, entry #190056: "In Hilary Term 1636, 7. I took the Degree of Batchelor of Arts; and in 1640, the Degree of Master of Arts, and then left Emanuel College; and the same year I entered into Holy Ord…"
3 Quotes by John Wallis on Art
"John Davys, John Wallis, An Essay on the Art of Decyphering: In which is inserted a discourse of Dr. Wallis. Now first publish'd from his original manuscript in the publick library at Oxford"
"In Hilary Term 1636, 7. I took the Degree of Batchelor of Arts; and in 1640, the Degree of Master of Arts, and then left Emanuel College; and the same year I entered into Holy Orders, ordained by Bishop Curle, then Bishop of Winchester. I then lived a Chaplain for about a year, in the house of Sr. Richard Darley, at Buttercramb in Yorkshire, and then, for two years more, with the Lady Vere, partly in London, and partly at Castlc-Hedingham in Essex, the antient seat of the Earls of Oxford."
"Let as many Numbers, as you please, be proposed to be Combined: Suppose Five, which we will call a b c d e. Put, in so many Lines, Numbers, in duple proportion, beginning with 1. The Sum is the Number of Sumptions, or Elections; wherein, one or more of them, may several ways be taken. Hence subduct the Number of the Numbers proposed; because each of them may once be taken singly. And the Remainder shews how many ways they may be taken in Combination; And, consequently, how many Products may be had by the Multiplication of any two or more of them so taken. But the same Sum without such Subduction, shews how many Aliquot Parts there are in the greatest of those Products, a b c d e. For every one of those Sumptions, are Aliquot Parts of a b c d e, except the last, and instead thereof, 1 is also an Aliquot Part; which makes the number of Aliquot Parts, the same with the Number of Sumptions. Only here is to be understood, that, all the Numbers proposed, are to be Prime Numbers, and each distinct from the other. For if any of them be Compound Numbers, or any Two of them be the same, the Rule for Aliquot Parts will not hold."