"Most proponents of a mandatory retirement age or term limits claim that we should amend the Constitution in order to alleviate the problems associated with life tenure. Their proposals implicitly reject an incentives approach to retirement because they assume that Justices will not act rationally in response to institutional modifications. In other words, both proposals are not only radical in their scope and represent substantial constitutional change, but they also rely on the remarkable proposition that Justices are fundamentally different from the rest of us in the way they approach economic decisions. There is little evidence to commend this view, and there is considerable empirical research to the contrary that supports Judge Posner’s thesis that Justices maximize the same thing everybody else does: their own utility.11 Put simply, legal scholars have not thought creatively about life tenure, shunning promising interdisciplinary approaches in favor of drastic constitutional change."
React to this quote
More by David Stras
See allResonant Thoughts
"A great deal of talent is lost to the world for the want of a little courage. Every day sends to their graves a number of obscure men who have only remained obscure because their timidity has prevente…"
Explore Further
Related Quotes
"It’s like a fairy tale… give you a context in which to talk about some things that you’re experiencing in y…"
— Suzan-Lori Parks"Suffering makes us human. A person without suffering is just grass."
— Vasil Bykaŭ"You are a worm who thought himself a serpent just because you slither. But your power was not real, Pliny. …"
— Pierce Brown"As far as the BJP is concerned, our belief has been the same for years. Justice to all, appeasement of none…"
— Narendra Modi"Hitler promised me protection after I had participated in the Munich putsch in 1923. I am very proud that I…"
— Julius Streicher"I still think that being forced to leave your home out of fear is one of the worst injustices a human being…"
— Nadia Murad