"The type of rationality we assume in economics — perfect, logical, deductive rationality — is extremely useful in generating solutions to theoretical problems. But it demands much of human behavior — much more in fact than it can usually deliver. If we were to imagine the vast collection of decision problems economic agents might conceivably deal with as a sea or an ocean, with the easier problems on top and more complicated ones at increasing depth, then deductive rationality would describe human behavior accurately only within a few feet of the surface. For example, the game Tic-Tac-Toe is simple, and we can readily find a perfectly rational, minimax solution to it. But we do not find rational “solutions” at the depth of Checkers; and certainly not at the still modest depths of Chess and Go."
More by W. Brian Arthur
See allResonant Thoughts
"What role would men and governments in new countries like the mass media to play?... The mass media can help to present Singapore's problems simply and clearly and then explain how if they support cer…"
Explore Further
Related Quotes
"Um, so, the world is not as wild as it was. Well, we've destroyed it. Not just ruined it. I mean, we have c…"
— David Attenborough"This isn't really, and never has been, a debate about science, it's about religion and philosophy."
— Phillip E. Johnson"Religion survives science and secular ideology not because it is prior to or more primitive than science or…"
— Scott Atran"The influence Marxism has achieved, far from being the result or proof of its scientific character, is almo…"
— Paul Hollander"For Linnaeus, Homo sapiens was both special and not special. Special and not special have come to mean nonb…"
— Stephen Jay Gould"Thanks to the growing politicization of the aristocracy of letters, the unwary are being fed on the misconc…"
— Harsh Narain
