"Now what I desire to know is this: If we want to shoot a man and he badly wants to shoot us, why should we not take his property as well as his life? Isn't that the way men win a 'fatherland' first? Don't they fight and conquer the original owners and then take the land? Very well then, what is the good of being a soldier, of risking your life, and being a brave man in battle, if you cannot sieze from your beaten enemy, what your greater valor wins and what you stand badly in need of?"
React to this quote
More by Arthur Desmond
See allResonant Thoughts
"He must be taught that war is not precise or economical. It is almost inconceivably wasteful and extravagant. It burns the house to roast the pig, and even then seldom roasts him effectively..... wast…"
Explore Further
Related Quotes
"Ideas and not battles mark the forward progress of mankind. Individuals, and not masses, form the culture o…"
— L. Ron Hubbard"They say the rebels in Iraq still fight for Saddam but that's bullshit. I'll tell you why it's totally wron…"
— Immortal Technique"And what have we now in Germany? A land of bankers and car-makers. Even our great army has gone soft. Soldi…"
— Hanna Reitsch"In the US. Infantry Manual published during World War II, the soldier was told what to do if a live grenade…"
— Anatol Rapoport"The world wants water not taps, the world wants warmth not a heater."
— Philippe Starck"Lip service to disarmament is insufficient; the goal is to find ways to redirect the resources used for the…"
— Alfred-Maurice de Zayas

