Search the Archive

"Articles by Wells from the Access Research Network"

"There are already scientists-- respected scientists in this country who do experiments on things that most people consider supernatural, such as prayer. When Newton proposed the theory of gravitation …"

"The truth is Darwinism is not a scientific theory, but a materialistic creation myth masquerading as science. It is first and foremost a weapon against religion – especially traditional Christianity. …"

"Wells's book rests entirely on a flawed syllogism: hence, textbooks illustrate evolution with examples; these examples are sometimes presented in incorrect or misleading ways; therefore evolution is a…"

"Answers to Wells's 10 questions from National Center for Science Education"

"Discovery Institute fellow Jonathan Wells is a major purveyor of misleading, inaccurate, and incorrect statements about evolution. His book Icons of Evolution is notorious for its distortions and fals…"

"At the end of the Washington Monument rally in September, 1976, I was admitted to the second entering class at Unification Theological Seminary. During the next two years, I took a long prayer walk ev…"

"Icons of Evolution? - Why much of what Jonathan Wells writes about evolution is wrong"

"As a graduate student at Yale, I studied the whole of Christian theology but focused my attention on the Darwinian controversies. I wanted to get to the root of the conflict between Darwinian evolutio…"

"Chapter by Chapter analysis of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design by Dr. Reed A. Cartwright, The Panda's Thumb"

"Wells's testimony at the Kansas evolution hearings"

"FAQ on Jonathan Wells from talk.origins"

"Science follows the evidence wherever it leads, but Darwinism does not. So the present controversy over evolution is not a war between science and religion. It is primarily a war between Darwinism and…"

"I would give Wells' book a grade of an "F", because he distorts and mis-quotes scientists and does not write to encourage people to build upon a logical foundation, but rather to blindly accept his "p…"